Comments on: Thin Web Server Benchmarks http://www.webficient.com/2008/06/30/thin-web-server-benchmarks-using-ruby-on-rails Managed Development Services Wed, 07 Jan 2009 03:46:23 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 By: dctabuyz http://www.webficient.com/2008/06/30/thin-web-server-benchmarks-using-ruby-on-rails#comment-260 dctabuyz Fri, 07 Nov 2008 06:29:34 +0000 tag:webficient.com,2008-06-30:24#comment-260 i have tested nginx0.5.35 + thin1.0.0 vs apache2.2.9 + passenger 2.0.3. and thin outperforms. <a href="http://img-fotki.yandex.ru/get/3006/dctabuyz.3/0_1c457_9da1a82f_XL.jpg" title="proofpic" rel="nofollow">proofpic</a> rails 2.1.2, Ruby-enterprise-1.8.6-20080810 I've been surprised i have tested nginx0.5.35 + thin1.0.0 vs apache2.2.9 + passenger 2.0.3. and thin outperforms. proofpic

rails 2.1.2, Ruby-enterprise-1.8.6-20080810

I’ve been surprised

]]> By: mormon http://www.webficient.com/2008/06/30/thin-web-server-benchmarks-using-ruby-on-rails#comment-9 mormon Mon, 11 Aug 2008 23:38:01 +0000 tag:webficient.com,2008-06-30:24#comment-9 I've read a few blog posts saying that mod_rails is now stronger and production ready. If it's faster than thin--well that's a good thing, too. Hats off to them. I’ve read a few blog posts saying that mod_rails is now stronger and production ready. If it’s faster than thin–well that’s a good thing, too. Hats off to them.

]]>